Mission Statement
“Christ Jesus as our Cornerstone” – Ephesians 2:20
We are the St Hilda’s family, with Jesus Christ as our Cornerstone.
Building on foundations of wisdom, hope, community, dignity and equality, we nurture and support one another to be our very best.
We rejoice in our diversity and celebrate our many achievements
Curriculum Vision
At St Hilda’s Church of England High School, our curriculum is rooted in our Christian vision, inspired by Ephesians and the belief that Jesus Christ is our cornerstone. Our six core values — community, hope, wisdom, diversity, equality, and dignity— are woven throughout the curriculum to ensure every student is known, valued, and supported to flourish.
We believe that education should be transformational. Our curriculum is designed to enable all students to flourish academically, spiritually, morally, and socially — preparing for life after St Hilda’s. It is intentionally inclusive, reflecting the diversity of our community
The curriculum is knowledge-rich, ambitious, and coherently sequenced, ensuring parity of experience for all students. Departments lead the design and delivery of their subjects, adapting centrally developed materials to meet students’ needs. Learning is grounded in Rosenshine’s Principles, promoting memory, understanding, and high-quality instruction.
Our model of student-centred implementation and aspirational intervention ensures that no learner is left behind. Assessment is used formatively to support progression, with curriculum acting as the progression model itself.
Flourishing staff lead to flourishing students. Our CPD is collaborative, research-informed, and rooted in practical application. Staff are supported to bridge the knowing–doing gap and continually improve their craft through a culture of trust, reflection, and shared purpose.
We are strengthening our provision for PSHE and personal development, embedding opportunities for character education, ethical discussion, and spiritual reflection across the curriculum and wider school life. These developments are recognised in our recent Outstanding SIAMS inspection, which praised our commitment to developing the whole child.
In every subject and every classroom, our aim is to nurture curious, compassionate, and courageous young people, who value learning and knowledge. We want students to leave St Hilda’s equipped not only with knowledge and qualifications but with the wisdom, integrity and resilience to flourish in life and contribute to the flourishing of others.
Implementation of the Curriculum Vision
At St Hilda’s Church of England High School, we implement our curriculum vision—rooted in our Christian ethos and inspired by Ephesians, with Christ as our cornerstone—by making our six core values community, hope, wisdom, diversity, equality, and dignity visible in everyday teaching and learning. These values guide how subjects are planned, taught, and assessed so that every student is known, valued, and supported to flourish academically, spiritually, morally and socially. Our approach is deliberately knowledge‑rich, ambitious, inclusive and coherently sequenced, enabling all learners to access “powerful knowledge”—conceptual, subject‑specific knowledge that takes pupils beyond their immediate experiences and empowers informed participation in the world. [dl.booksee.org]
High‑quality teaching anchored in Rosenshine’s Principles
Across the school, classroom practice is grounded in Rosenshine’s Principles of Instruction. Teachers begin lessons with brief reviews to strengthen prior knowledge; present new material in small steps with modelling and worked examples; use frequent questioning and checks for understanding; and move from guided to independent practice, with weekly and monthly reviews to secure long‑term retention. These routines reflect evidence from cognitive science, studies of expert teachers, and effective scaffolding. [aft.org], [Principles….:21; 2010]
Retrieval practice, literacy and vocabulary, and powerful knowledge
· Retrieval Practice (Kate Jones): Departments embed daily/weekly retrieval activities (low‑stakes quizzing, spaced review, hybrid recall/MCQ prompts) to strengthen long‑term memory and combat forgetting, applying strategies popularised in Kate Jones’ work and aligned with the wider evidence base on retrieval. [teachlikea…ampion.org]
· Literacy & Vocabulary (Alex Quigley): We take a disciplinary literacy approach so that students learn to read, write, speak and use vocabulary like subject specialists—from morphology and etymology in science and MFL to academic vocabulary in humanities—drawing on Alex Quigley’s work on Closing the Vocabulary Gap and the EEF’s emphasis on subject‑specific literacy. [alexquigley.co.uk]
· Powerful Knowledge (Young): Schemes of learning are sequenced to give equitable access to systematic, specialised disciplinary knowledge that explains, predicts, and enables students to envisage alternatives—core to social justice and our commitment to flourishing. [my.chartered.college]
Inclusive practice and targeted support: EEF ‘Five‑a‑day’ for SEND
We invest in small‑group, high‑impact CPD focused on the EEF’s ‘Five‑a‑day’ approaches for pupils with SEND—explicit instruction; cognitive and metacognitive strategies; scaffolding; flexible grouping; and effective use of technology. Teachers and TAs build a repertoire, applying these strategies adaptively in lessons and interventions, ensuring pupils with SEND benefit first from excellent teaching and targeted support. [d2tic4wvo1…dfront.net], [educatione…ion.org.uk]
Subject expertise and department‑led professional development
Our curriculum is designed and quality‑assured by qualified, trained subject specialists, with departmental CPD that hones subject knowledge and pedagogy. Department teams use lesson study, co‑planning and moderated work scrutiny to align resources with the progression model and to refine explanations, models, examples and misconceptions—consistent with Rosenshine’s emphasis on modelling/checking and the curriculum principle of powerful knowledge. [aft.org]
Assessment that supports progression and dignity
In line with our values of wisdom and dignity, assessment is used formatively to respond to need (for example, via retrieval checks and questioning) and summatively at agreed points, with feedback that is actionable and compassionate. Curriculum acts as the progression model: departments map out what powerful knowledge is to be learned, when, and how it is revisited, so that every learner experiences parity of ambition and opportunity. [aft.org]
Flourishing staff, flourishing students: research‑informed CPD
We sustain a collaborative CPD culture that bridges the knowing–doing gap. Alongside the EEF’s SEND guidance and tools, staff engage with evidence on explicit instruction and retrieval, disciplinary literacy, and curriculum theory in subject networks and coaching cycles, translating research into everyday classroom routines that embody our values of community and hope. [educatione…ion.org.uk]
What this looks like in the classroom (vision into practice)
· Community & Equality: Dialogue tasks with explicit vocabulary scaffolds ensure all voices are heard; flexible grouping and TA deployment respond to current mastery so no learner is left behind. [d2tic4wvo1…dfront.net]
· Wisdom: Teachers make disciplinary thinking explicit (e.g., ‘how historians corroborate sources’ or ‘how scientists model systems’), connecting new concepts to prior knowledge through modelling, guided practice and worked examples. [aft.org]
· Dignity & Diversity: Adaptive teaching via the five‑a‑day repertoire respects individual starting points while maintaining high expectations and access to the full curriculum. [d2tic4wvo1…dfront.net]
· Hope: Frequent retrieval and cumulative review help students experience success, building confidence and long‑term mastery. [teachlikea…ampion.org]
Through these coherent, evidence‑informed practices, St Hilda’s implements its Christian, values‑led curriculum so that students leave not only knowledgeable and well‑qualified, but wise, compassionate and resilient—ready to flourish and to contribute to the flourishing of others.
Curriculum Model
Key Stage 3
| Subject | Year 7 | Year 8 | Year 9 |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Maths | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Science | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| RE/PSHE | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| PE | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| Drama | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| French | – | 2 | 3 |
| German | 3 | – | 3 |
| Spanish | 3 | 2 | – |
| Geography | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| History | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Art | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| D&T | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Food | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Music | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| D of E | – | – | 1 |
| Week Timetable | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Numbers in each column represent lessons per fortnight.
One group in year 7 will study an additional 2 hours of English per Fortnight.
Most groups study two languages at Key Stage 3. However, some groups study one language.
The languages students study at Key Stage 3 depend upon their current year group, as follows:
Year 7:
The majority of students study German and Spanish in Year 7.
Students continue with that language in Years 8 and 9.
Year 8:
The majority of students studied French and Spanish in Year 7.
Students continue with both languages in Years 8 and 9.
Year 9:
The majority of students studied French and German in Year 7.
Students continue with both languages in Years 8 and 9.
Key Stage 4
| Subject | Year 10 | Year 11 |
|---|---|---|
| English | 10 | 10 |
| Maths | 8 | 8 |
| Science | 10 | 9 |
| RE/PSHE | 4 | 4 |
| PSHE | 1 | 1 |
| PE | 2 | 2 |
| 3 Options – 5hrs per subject | Triple Science Drama French German Spanish Geography Ancient History History Art D&T Hospitality & Catering Computer Science Music PE Sports Studies Business Studies Health & Social Prince’s Trust Public Services | Triple Science Drama French German Spanish Geography Ancient History History Art D&T Hospitality & Catering Computer Science Music PE Sports Studies Business Studies Health & Social Prince’s Trust Public Services |
| Week Timetable | 50 | 50 |
When choosing their 3 Options subjects, students must pick AT LEAST ONE of the highlighted subjects
Where uptake is too low to make the course viable, a subject won’t run.
Key Stage 5
| Year 12 | Year 13 |
|---|---|
| 3 Options – 10hrs per subject | 3 Options – 10hrs per subject |
| 2 hrs – RE 2 hrs – Enrichment 2 hrs – EPQ 4hrs – Maths re-sit 4hrs – English re-sit English English Lit Media Maths Maths Further Applied Science BTEC Biology Chemistry Physics French German Spanish Geography Geology History Philosophy and Ethics Art & Design D&T Business H&SC Psychology Sociology Criminology IT BTEC Music Sport BTEC Theatre Studies | English English Lit Media Maths Maths Further Applied Science BTEC Biology Chemistry Physics French German Spanish Geography Geology History Philosophy and Ethics Art & Design D&T Business H&SC Psychology Sociology Criminology IT BTEC Music Sport BTEC Theatre Studies |
Where uptake is too low to make the course viable, a subject won’t run.
Assessment and Reporting
Our approach to assessment and reporting ensures parents and carers are well-informed about student progress and learning habits.
How we report to families
Progress reports: We send written reports to parents/carers twice per year.
Parents’ evening: Each year group has one parents’ evening annually to discuss progress, targets, and next steps
Key Stage 3 (Years 7–9)
Examination outcomes: Twice per year we report each student’s exam percentage, shown alongside the year-group average to indicate performance in context.
Commitment to Learning (CtL): All KS3 students receive CtL scores on a 4–1 scale, where 4 is best. CtL captures attendance/ready-to-learn habits, responsibility and organisation, engagement and participation, work ethic and task completion (including home learning), and behaviour for learning. Full descriptors appear in our CtL guidance.
click here to view Our Commitment to Learning Descriptors
Key Stage 4 (Years 10–11)
Aspirational targets using FFT20: We allocate GCSE target grades using FFT20 benchmarks. FFT estimates are evidence-based, drawing on national data for students with similar prior attainment, gender and month of birth; FFT20 reflects the outcomes of pupils in schools making high (top 20%) progress, so the targets are challenging yet achievable. These estimates summarise a probability distribution of possible grades for each pupil, and the single target grade is set at the distribution’s mid‑point. Using FFT20 helps us set ambitious expectations while recognising individual variation. [support.fft.org.uk], [ffteducati…lab.org.uk]
Reported outcomes: We report GCSE grades on the 9–1 scale in line with national policy, where 9 is the highest grade. [gov.uk], [assets.pub…ice.gov.uk]
CtL: KS4 students also receive termly CtL scores (4–1)
We make reasonable adjustments for students with approved exam access arrangements (such as extra time, readers, or use of technology) in accordance with JCQ regulations.
Key Stage 5 (Years 12–13)
Reported outcomes:
A level: Grades A–E (with A* where applicable).
Applied/BTEC: We report the appropriate vocational grade, typically from D* (Distinction Star) through Distinction/Merit/Pass, including Level 1 Pass where relevant.
CtL: KS5 students receive CtL scores (4–1) to reflect study habits and professional behaviours that support successful post‑16 learning.
We make reasonable adjustments for students with approved exam access arrangements in accordance with JCQ regulations.
Understanding CtL (Commitment to Learning)
Our CtL descriptors define what “Always” (4), “Mostly” (3), “Sometimes” (2) and “Rarely” (1) look like for readiness, organisation/equipment, participation, perseverance, home learning, and behaviour. A CtL 0 may be used where there is no evidence due to absence. See Understanding CtL for the full rubric. [Understanding CtL | Word]
Our approach to assessment in the classroom
Formative assessment: checking understanding to improve learning
Teachers use formative assessment continuously to elicit evidence of learning and adapt teaching “in the moment.” Typical strategies include mini‑whiteboards, cold‑calling, targeted questioning, exit tickets, and low‑stakes quizzing (short, ungraded retrieval checks). Done well, formative assessment supports long‑term learning—especially when it focuses on retrieval practice and avoids confusing short‑term performance with genuine learning. [learningspy.co.uk], [mdpi.com]
· Why it matters: Research synthesised in recent reviews shows formative assessment, when implemented explicitly to inform next steps, can improve achievement across K‑12 settings. [mdpi.com]
· A caution from the research community: Educators (including David Didau and others) caution that correct answers in class can sometimes reflect temporary performance rather than durable learning; therefore we build in spacing, interleaving, and retrieval to strengthen memory over time. [learningspy.co.uk], [improvingt…hing.co.uk]
· Low‑stakes quizzing: Short, frequent practice quizzes enhance retention and metacognition and guide re‑teaching without adding pressure. [files.eric.ed.gov], [craftonhills.edu]
Summative assessment: evaluating learning at key point
· Mid and End‑of‑year summative assessments are taken in Years 7–9, providing a clear snapshot of mastered content and skills, and informing progression to the next year/course.
· At KS4 and KS5, summative assessments (including mocks) align to qualification specifications so that reported grades (9–1 at GCSE; A–E/A* at A level; BTEC D*–Pass) are meaningful and comparable. [gov.uk]
Diagnostic assessment: identifying gaps to target instruction
We use diagnostic tests (baseline checks, pre‑unit quizzes, and item analyses) before and during teaching to pinpoint prior knowledge, misconceptions, and specific skill gaps. Diagnostic assessments are typically ungraded and help teachers tailor instruction, provide early intervention, and plan effective re‑teaching. [unco.edu], [ebsco.com]
Assessment in PSHE: an ipsative model
In PSHE, we adopt an ipsative assessment approach—students’ current work is compared to their own prior work rather than to peers or an external standard. This emphasises personal growth, reflection, and goal‑setting. Teachers use baseline tasks, reflective journals/portfolios, and end‑point reviews to help students see how far they’ve come and to plan next steps. [pshe-assoc…ion.org.uk], [files.eric.ed.gov]
What “ipsative” means: From the Latin ipse (“self”), ipsative assessment is self‑referential: it tracks individual improvement over time, complementing criterion‑referenced judgments in other subjects. [files.eric.ed.gov], [institute4…arning.com]
Our assessment principles
1. Validity & alignment: Summative tasks reflect taught curriculum; formative tasks elicit the right evidence to guide teaching. [mdpi.com]
2. High expectations: FFT20 targets and clear success criteria foster stretch while supporting wellbeing. [support.fft.org.uk]
3. Behaviour for learning: CtL recognises the attitudes and routines that underpin progress. [Understanding CtL | Word]
4. Equity: Diagnostic assessment informs targeted support so all learners can succeed. [unco.edu], [ebsco.com]
5. Transparency: Twice‑yearly reports and an annual parents’ evening maintain a strong home–school partnership.
Optional “Further reading” for families
- GCSE 9–1 grading explained – Ofqual guidance. [gov.uk]
- · FFT estimates & target benchmarks – FFT Education Datalab overview. [ffteducati…lab.org.uk]
- · Formative assessment & learning – Classroom implications and cautions. [learningspy.co.uk], [improvingt…hing.co.uk]
- · Ipsative assessment in PSHE – PSHE Association guidance (members’ overview). [pshe-assoc…ion.org.uk
